It's some of the most uncomfortable noise and we just crank it right up." Even when I would look away while we were shooting it and when we were editing, you can't get away from the sound. Because we weren't really using music in the film almost ever, all that sound design is just front and center. I think the difference is, for all its description, the thing you never consider is the sound. I heard people say, "Oh my God, it's even worse than described." I don't think it actually is. For us we had it kind of flop back down afterwards because it was just too grizzly. I think the hand/glove came just about completely off. Visually, I don't think we even took it as far as he took it in the book. When I was reading it for the first time, I had to put the book down. "I'll tell you, the principle difference is the sound. The book's corresponding chapter describes Jessie's procedure with all of the detail King can muster, comparing the woman's skin sloughing off at the handcuff's borders as, "Sliding the way a heavy object on a rug will slide if someone pulls on the rug." It conjures up some rough visuals, and Flanagan was up for the challenge of making the gory moment resemble what readers have imagined in their heads: A shard of broken glass acts as a makeshift scalpel while Jessie effectively skins her right hand in order to slip out of the cuff and reach the key that sits atop a nearby bureau.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |